Webinar: Randomization and the Limits of Precision Oncology
August 26, 2021
Drug development in oncology is undergoing several changes brought about by precision medicine, which makes it appealing to move efficacy assessment to earlier-phase trials and questions the need for randomized trials. Indeed, some remarkably efficacious drugs have even been approved based on uncontrolled phase I or II trials.
With very few exceptions, we challenge the view that the expected benefits from new drugs are generally sufficient to forgo randomization to a standard-of-care arm. Apparently improved outcomes in a single-arm early trial may be due at least in part to the prognostic nature of the target and to selection bias, rather than result from a true effect of therapy. Moreover, the predictive role of biomarkers cannot be ascertained in a definitive way without randomization to a control arm.
On the other hand, randomization often raises scientific, ethical and economic issues when precision medicine is understood in a very strict sense, according to which each tumor presents a unique molecular landscape in a manner that precludes the formation of groups of patients with a similar disease.
The challenge for the scientific community moving forward will be to strike the right balance between eliciting high-level evidence, such as that originating from randomized trials, and leveraging the full potential of precision medicine.
|9:50||Online platform opens for registering participants|
David Munis Zepernick, Head of Business Development and Public Affairs, Medicon Valley Alliance
|10:05||Randomization and the limits of precision oncology|
Everardo Saad, Medical Director, IDDI
|11:00||End of webinar|